← Course contents · Part 4

· Visual lesson · Session 34 of 56


What should we monitor?

Start monitoring with a question: are users getting correct results on time? Then follow the dependencies that explain the answer.

Picture the idea

From user impact to physical cause

  1. Application

    Correct output, completion time, errors

  2. Scheduler

    Queue wait and placement

  3. GPU and server

    Memory, clocks, health, input supply

  4. Network and facilities

    Links, power, cooling, fresh measurements

Trace an affected job through these layers with stable identities. This is an investigation map, not a claim that every fault follows this order.

Connect the layers

Look at application progress, queue wait, GPU health, server and network behavior, and relevant facility signals.

Keep identity attached: which GPU, host, rack, and job? A temperature without a location is hard to act on.

One sample is not a trend. A quiet GPU might be loading, waiting, checkpointing, or finished.

A read-only starting point

On an authorized NVIDIA Linux host with driver tools:

nvidia-smi --query-gpu=name,uuid,memory.used,memory.total,temperature.gpu,utilization.gpu --format=csv

Field availability varies. This is not an Apple GPU command.

An alert needs an owner and a next action. Missing measurements should appear as unknown, not healthy.

Try it yourself

A job slows down, but memory use stays steady. What else would you inspect?

Check your answer

Phase timings, GPU activity and clocks, input delays, communication, errors, and recent changes. Allocated memory does not prove that calculation is progressing. Avoid unbounded metric labels; detailed request history may belong in logs instead.

Sources and further reading

← All sessions