← Course contents · Part 5

· Visual lesson · Session 44 of 56


Diagnose a troubled cluster

Use these three fictional incidents to practice choosing evidence. Do not jump straight to a restart.

Picture the idea

Match the symptom to the investigation

Idle GPUs after dataset change

Inspect input delivery and preparation

One participant slows the job

Compare its communication path

Recovery hurts healthy jobs

Inspect shared loading demand

Three fictional hypotheses. Choose evidence that could prove your preferred explanation wrong.

Three different symptoms

Idle GPUs after a dataset change: storage latency rose and the input now contains many small files. Compare read and preparation time before blaming calculation.

One node slows the whole job: its standalone math test passes, but communication performs worse. Compare its links, placement, and configuration with a healthy peer.

Recovery hurts healthy users: every returning replica loads its model together and storage latency spikes. Investigate the shared recovery demand.

Write an investigation

For each case, note impact, recent changes, one leading hypothesis, and evidence that could disprove it.

Then choose a safe containment step and a recovery check. Disruptive tests need authorization; physical faults may need qualified facilities staff.

Check your answer

The three starting points are input delivery, the affected communication path, and synchronized recovery load. These are hypotheses, not proven causes.

A useful answer narrows the problem and verifies completed work afterward. The same blind restart for all three cases does neither.

← All sessions